"Long, Lean Muscles":
Wishful Thinking or Factual Distinction?
Contributed by Evamarie Pilipuf
(Return to Articles List)
As an exercise physiologist, I wince when I hear
the game of
Telephone being played with otherwise legitimate exercise science.
You know what I mean….an original fact gets passed along and gradually altered
into such non sequiturs as “muscle weighs more than fat,” “calories don’t
count,” and “stay in your fat-burning zone.” Pshaw! One of the latest
incarnations, “long, lean muscles,” has become a sort of battle cry for many a Pilates instructor. While I actually think very highly of Pilates—it’s quite
compatible with yoga, this catch phrase makes me feel...fidgety, as it
represents only a half-truth at best. Thankfully, there are conscientious
instructors whose knowledge base and ethics keep them from resorting to this
kind of hype; when you realize just how complicated the underlying science is,
you’ll understand why that’s the more responsible route.
You can't "create" a long muscle
For starters, to say a given workout will deliver
“long, lean muscles” suggests that the undesired opposite is a workout that
causes short, bulky muscles. From an exercise physiology perspective, this
makes no sense, as our bodies are naturally made up of both long and short
muscles. These varying lengths are pre-determined anatomically; they cannot
be altered through a select type of exercise. Your rear deltoids (back
shoulder muscles) are short, yet no one, I can assure you, has ever looked
bulky because of an over-developed rear deltoid! On the other hand, the
longest muscle in the body is the sartorius (hip/thigh). Not only is this
long and relatively slender in shape, it is likely to remain so….even if you
train it with a high amount of resistance.
"Bulky" muscles tough to achieve in women
Truth be told, women (for the most part) lack the
biochemistry to achieve the "bulky" muscle appearance of, say, a body
builder.….in the world of competitive body building, steroid use is quite
high for this very reason. I have to chuckle when I overhear a woman
scoffing at lifting 5-lb. weights, once a week, fearing her shoulders will
overdevelop! Honey, don’t we all wish. Getting those “popped out” shoulder
muscles requires many sets, extremely heavy (think: 15, 20, 25 lbs. and more)
weights, a clean diet, and a genetic tendency towards building a muscular
appearance.
More a factor of body type, less a factor of
exercise type
Which leads to point #3, your pre-determined
genetic body type—a major factor in predicting whether “long and lean” is in
the cards for you. If you’re inclined to attain a more athletic, solid,
muscular appearance, you’re of a body type (mesomorph) that is utterly
disinclined to develop the so-called “long, lean” look. Whether you gain the
same amount of lean muscle mass through free weights or Pilates, the look of
that muscle will be identical—one will not be “leaner” or “bulkier” in
appearance than the other. By contrast, the tendency of the ectomorphic body
type is towards that aforementioned “long, lean” look; however, ectomorphs
will struggle to gain a measurable muscle mass in the way that the mesomorphs
do. In that regard, it would be just as disingenuous of me to claim that
merely switching from, say, Pilates to free weights will “make” the
ectomorph’s body look more substantial and sculpted. Endomorphs, the third
body type, are predisposed toward a curvier body type; they can develop some
muscle mass, but an inclination towards a higher body fat percentage will
mean those muscles won’t be especially pronounced or chiseled in appearance.
Oprah Winfrey is a good example of an endomorph.
"Get the Body of a Dancer" (etc. ad nauseum)
While I'm on the subject of body type, I may as
well put that claim--a distant cousin to the "long, lean muscles" concept--to
rest once and for all. If you haven't yet had the pleasure, this is
another claim tossed about in the Pilates and dance community. Now, I
come from a professional dance background; indeed, in the height of my ballet
career, I had the so-called "long, lean lines of a dancer." Yet, I'm a
mesomporph--one look at this website's home page will tell you that. So
how did I achieve the "long, lean lines of the dancer," when clearly I'm not
of that inherent body type? Simple! I ate very little so that my
weight dropped way below its current level....not smart. Pathetically,
my directors and teachers "loved" the look. Fortunately, I've wised up
plentifully since then. The point I'm making is that if you're body
isn't inclined to have "the look of the dancer" already, chances are you
won't be able to achieve it with modified ballet or Pilates movements
alone......you would need to embark on more extreme--in some cases,
unhealthy--measures in diet and exercise. Trust me, your health is far
more important than chasing that waterfall.
"Lean" is not just a function of exercise
It would be nice if becoming lean were as simple
as switching to a different form of exercise, but it isn't. Really, I
think part of the appeal of exercise programs which claim to deliver "long
lean muscles" is that such a claim implies that your current appearance--if
it isn't long and lean--is merely the result of "bulky" muscles. Let's
face it, it's much more emotionally comfortable to blame one's appearance on
"bulky muscle," when the real culprit may be excess fat. It's not easy
to be the one to call it like it is, but I'm of the attitude that the only
way you will ever take care of a problem is to meet it head-on. If you
have excess weight, your chances of resolving that weight issue solely
through exercise--even the "long, lean muscle" variety--are not good; you'll
also need to take stock of your eating habits, and be prepared for a long
battle. Depressing, yes, but achievable....with grueling honesty and
unyielding hard work.
Anecdotal Testimonies are Us!
Despite everything I've laid out, I guarantee
you'll still encounter folks who "swear" by a given activity, citing the
reasons that "nothing else worked." While it's always helpful to
solicit feedback from satisfied participants, for the "converts" that insist
that "only this type of exercise will bring this result," keep in mind that
there's almost always more to the story than meets the eye--both yours and
the storytellers. Maybe this person was finally ready to commit
long-term; maybe this person began eating less in conjunction with the new
exercise; maybe the activity is low enough in intensity (read: more
than 20 repetitions are able to be performed per exercise) that there has not
been significant gains in muscle mass. One way or another, you need to
listen to anecdotal testimony--whether in person or on an Infomercial--with a
grain of salt.
The bottom line is, do a particular exercise for
what it will bring you in terms of good health and fitness; steer clear of
choosing an exercise based on a claim that almost seems too good to be true.
As it turns out, Pilates is a wonderful activity, boasting well-documented,
fitness-friendly benefits. But capitulating these benefits into “you’ll get
long, lean muscles” ignores the fact that the visual image associated with such
a phrase is simply not deliverable in most people’s bodies. I’d rather see an
emphasis on a more yogic approach: use Pilates to better understand your
body—both its inherent strengths and limitations, then work in a reality that
reflects what’s achievable given your unique biology, and not somebody else’s
imposition of an aesthetic ideal. –ep
Return to top of page. |